Leaky-home owners' claims upheld


A couple who paid $913,000 for a leaky Meadowbank house fought for four years to get it reclad after an earlier repair continued to let water into the home.

Then the recladding business took them to the High Court.

In a hellish scenario, Roger Jerzy and Samantha Kay Zagorski went to the Weathertight Homes Resolution Service, then the more powerful Weathertight Homes Tribunal, to get money to fix their Fancourt St house which they bought after they came here from Australia.

But building specialist Ian Holyoake and his Hitex Building Systems, which did the first fix-up, lodged an appeal in the High Court, claiming the tribunal made mistakes about his liability, the scope of remediation work, the amount he had to pay and costs.

His appeal was also against Auckland Council, Wilkinson Building and Construction - who were involved in the failed 2004 and 2005 repairs - and others.

The case was heard last July.

In the High Court decision, Justice Patrick Keane said Holyoake's Hitex had completely reclad the place before the couple bought it, but that job using his "unique proprietary product Hitex 50" cladding had failed because timber framing was moist or wet, some was already decayed and there was mould.

Auckland Council's expert Clint Smith said that was not because Hitex 50 was inherently unsound but because of poor workmanship. He estimated a full reclad would cost $385,337.

The judge refused to overturn the tribunal's 2012 decision which ruled the couple are owed $433,087: $385,337 for remedial work, $22,750 for the loss of rent and $25,000 general damages.

"I conclude that the tribunal made no error in its liability, remedial scope, quantum and costs decision," the judge ruled.

Holyoake was liable with his Hitex for 73 per cent of the Zagorskis' damages award, just as the tribunal had ruled, he said.

The judge traced the history of the case, saying that in 2006, the couple had received a favourable pre-purchase report from Allied House Inspections. That report told them there were moisture probes throughout the house.

In 2010, they planned to return to Australia so decided to sell and got a report from a different assessor who said to go to Holyoake's business, the Moisture Detection Company, which had put the probes in the walls before they bought.

"The Zagorskis then discovered that the house had been moisture tested on 18 May, 2006, 10 days before they entered into the agreement for sale and purchase with the Wilkinson trustees and that some moisture readings then taken had been as high as 80 per cent and one third had been 18 per cent or higher," the judge said.

Holyoake argued that the Zagorskis bought the place knowing it had leaked in the past, had remedial work and ought to have been aware of the probes. Their failure to have readings taken before deciding to sell in 2010 contributed to the damage worsening, he said.

Leaky home liability

Fancourt St, Meadowbank, Auckland:

  • 1990s: House built and earlier last decade Wilkinson trustees buy it
  • 2004-2005: Big leak repairs carried out by Wilkinson Building and Construction and Ian Holyoake's Hitex
  • May 2006: Holyoake's moisture probes show 80 per cent readings but Zagorskis pay $913,000
  • 2010: Zagorskis decide to sell, investigate and go to Weathertight Homes Resolution Service
  • 2012: Weathertight Homes Tribunal awards them $433,087, 73 per cent from Holyoake
  • July, 2013: Holyoake goes to High Court at Auckland seeking to overturn tribunal decision
  • March 14, 2014: Court upholds tribunal ruling that Zagorskis must get $433,087
2014Alexander & Co. Ltd